The Best Response to Pseudo Darwinists
As if by intention, which it certainly was not, while looking for something else, I found a copy of a
book I had bought around 2009, and which I unintentionally mislaid during my 2010 move to our
current house (the chicks had left the nest for their own houses and I had
difficulty coping with the stairs to the 3-floors of the family house we lived
in).
Opening a cardboard box at the back of a cupboard, I found my brand new, unread copy of: H. Gintis, Samuel Bowles, Robert Boyd, and Ernst Fehr, editors
2005. “Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: the foundations of coopertion in economic life”, MIT.
I read the first chapter in 2009 and put the book down somewhere as you
do. It was shovelled into a box for the double move and ‘lost’ until last
evening. Some other books are
still missing, including my invaluable facsimile “Log of HMS Bounty”(see my ‘Captain Bligh: the man and his mutinies, Duckworth, 1988).
However, I am familiar with the literature of ‘behavioural’ authors,
anthropologists, primatologists, sociologists, evolutionary psychologists and games
theorists, which I used in the theories of reciprocation in a work I wrote on the
pre-history of bargaining and in my MBA class “Influence” at Edinburgh Business
School still attracting several scores of students each year.
These academics fit in neatly with Adam Smith’s work in TMS and WN.
I shall now settle down and read the rest of Gintis, et al. I am sure I shall enjoy doing so. No doubt I shall post occasionally on
Lost Legacy on significant aspects of bargaining relationships.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home