Smith on the Liberal Reward for Labour
"The
liberal reward of labour, therefore, as it is the effect of increasing wealth,
so it is the cause of increasing population. To complain of it, is to lament
over the necessary effect and cause of the greatest public prosperity. …
The
liberal reward of labour, as it encourages the propagation, so it increases the
industry of the common people. The wages of labour are the encouragement of
industry, which, like every other human quality, improves in proportion to the
encouragement it receives....Where wages are high, accordingly, we shall always
find the workmen more active, diligent, and expeditious, than where they are
low."
Comment
See the full account by Smith of the positive role of
high wages in Wealth Of Nations, (WN I, VIII: Of the Wages of
Labour).
Most of the deplorable affects of modernization from
industrialism in the 19th century, that Marx and Engels focussed
upon, and is now firmly embedded in the folk-lore of modern leftish social
democratic movements (though their political and trade union leaders ensure
that they achieve high incomes in the highest tax brackets of their respective
economies).
As it happens, the extremely low incomes of labourers,
certainly in the 18th and 19th centuries, were partly
occasioned by the dulling affects of large-scale migration of populations fro
the countryside and inward migration from Ireland, rather than inherent or necessary for a growing market economy. This rapid
growth of population filled the towns and cities and turned housing into slums, and lowered
wages rates in such jobs as in the mines (where my own family came from) and manual manufacturing.
Despite this dreadful experience suffered by many people,
industrialisation, particularly in engineering, also occasioned the growth
of skilled, technical and supervisory employments, on higher wages and promoted
education of those entering this work. It also promoted small
businesses using skilled labour and produced the high wages that Smith
applauded. The founding institutions of Heriot-Watt University, in Edinburgh, was the first school for training mechanical, chemical, mathematical and general technical education in 1821. Many other such schools were founded thereafter, feeding the demand for skilled and technical labourers that the growing UK economy needed.
Once that process takes-off in an economy it can
rapidly transform the situation in respect of wages for a slice of the labouring classes. Nigh-schools were a route for young labourers to climb out of low- wage poverty. [It was my route to university.] It’s happening now quite quickly in Africa and in the BRIC
economies, not neatly – history is messy – but inexorably.
Readers of Cora Robin’s Blog should have that drawn to
their attention.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home