Relative Prices Rule in Markets
“Peabody Energy
Corporation (BTU), Arch Coal Inc (ACI): Now Is the Time to Focus on Coal
Companies”.
Read more at Insider Monkey HERE
“Markets are guided by a so-called invisible hand in
which reasonably rational individuals do what is in their own best interests.
In the end, supply and demand come together to create a working ecosystem.
That's happening to coal in spades.
New methods of drilling for natural gas overtook
demand for the fuel and led to a steep price decline. That led utilities, the
largest users of coal, to switch to gas as a fuel source to keep costs down.
Coal demand and pricing fell as a result. The coal industry reduced production
and refined operations as a result.
Natural gas prices, however, were so low that drillers
couldn't make money drilling. Natural gas drilling has, thus, slowed. That has
pushed gas prices notably higher to the point where the choice between coal and
gas as a base load fuel is no longer tilted in favor of gas.
The invisible hand is an incredible thing. And there
are other long-term positives for coal, too.”
Read more at the above link.
Comment
Read this piece and note how the so-called “invisible
hand” attributed to Adam Smith has absolutely nothing to do with the ever changing relative VISIBLE prices of natural gas and coal having the predicted affects that “Motley
Fool” identifies nor any explanation of exactly what the contribution of the so-called “invisible hand” does in these
processes.
No explanation is given of what the “invisible-hand”
actually does to bring these changes about, separate from the normally expected reaction
of buyers and investors to changing VISIBLE prices in these markets.
Whatever “Motley Fool's” assertions, they have nothing
to do with what Adam Smith wrote in Wealth Of Nations nor what he wrote in
his “Theory of Moral Sentiments”.
And that itself is the real problem.
So imbued with the “invisible hand”
ideology are modern economists that they spout platitudes about the “invisible
hand” without ever questioning its thin-ice logic given the perfectly complete
explanation of relative price movements in competing markets nor they do stop to question the
import of an “invisible” operator whose role in VISIBLE price changes is
clearly redundant. Prices determine market decisions. There is no invisible force doing anything else in markets.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home