A Case For "Fact Checkers"
Scott S.
Smith, in Investor's Business Daily HERE
“Adam Smith Invented Modern Free-Market Economics”
“Adam Smith's
"Wealth of Nations" was published in 1776.
Good timing.
[Fortuitous perhaps,
but his book was ready in 1773 and he went to London to supervise it
publication. While there he got caught up in “zealous” debates with MPs and
Ministers about events in the British colonies of North America. His advice was not accepted (see
the very last paragraph in Wealth Of Nations for a hint at his advice).
Friends (David Hume and the Duke
of Buccleugh) advised him to desist and publish his book. He did so in March, 1776; it had been
printed in December 1775. The
‘timing’ was accidental, not planned]
Coming out the same
year as the Declaration of Independence, the book sparked its own revolution.
It showed that the
best way to expand an economy was for government to get out of the way of
entrepreneurs.
[Gross exaggeration;
Wealth Of Nations was mainly about how “merchants and manufacturers”, who
lobbied for tariffs and prohibitions, and domestic monopolies who were “in the
way” of free markets; of government he advised them to desist from listening to such lobbying and stop acting
as if they knew what was good for consumers.]
"He got most of
it right, and for the past two centuries economists have been filling in the
details," Tim Taylor, author of Teaching Co.'s audio course "Legacies
of the Great Economists," told IBD. "If you disagree with him, you
probably need to re-examine your ideas."
Smith (1723-90) was born
in Scotland to a civil servant who died two months later.
[Adam Smith’s father
died in January 1723 and he was born in June 1723]
His mother
encouraged his interest in learning and enrolled him in one of the best
secondary schools, giving him a solid foundation in the Latin classics,
history, writing and spelling. [He
attended Kirkcaldy Borough school, a couple of hundred yards from his mother’s
house - I have walked the distance between the site where his mother's house stood until demolished. It happened to be an excellent school due to his teacher, David Millar.]
At 14, he entered
the University of Glasgow and studied moral philosophy, developing a passion for
reason, free speech and liberty.
Three years later he
received a scholarship to Oxford University, but found the professors
uninterested in teaching or new ideas, so he spent his time outside class
reading widely in the library.
Unhappy, he left in
1746 before his scholarship was up.
Soon he was hired to
give lectures at the University of Edinburgh.
[Adam Smith was
never hired to lecture by Edinburgh University. He gave private lectures, in effect competing with the university, in a
hired hall off-campus to fee payers, sponsored by Henry Home, later Lord Kames,
and James Oswald, MP. Many
students of law or Divinity, plus members of the public voluntarily attended. We have no definite records of their
contents, other than his lectures on Rhetoric.]
Many of the themes
involved his thoughts on the relationship of morality, freedom and prosperity.
In 1751 he earned a
professorship at Glasgow University teaching logic and stayed in that post 12
years.
[Smith taught Logic for one year only, and then switched to the chair of Moral philosophy until 1764.]
Production
All the while, he
put down his thoughts — and in 1759 he came out with his first book, "The
Theory of Moral Sentiments." In it, he showed how morality depended on
sympathy between individuals.
"He explored
the processes by which we acquire the senses of propriety, justice, political
obligation and beauty on which our skills in the arts of social intercourse and
our character depend," Nicholas Phillipson wrote in his new biography,
"Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life." "In doing so, he introduced
into his analysis a simple observation about the principles of human nature
that had been ignored by modern philosophy, that man's natural indigence had
somehow gone hand in hand with a love of improvement which he would exercise
whenever he felt secure enough to do so."
The book attracted
students from all over Europe. Smith inspired them by extending his thinking
about the human tendency toward betterment — even economically.
Comment
If Scot Smith had read closely Nicholas Phillipson’s
excellent ‘Enlightened Life’ he
would not have got the above facts so wrong. I trust that Investor’s Business Daily employs
fact-checkers for ensuring that their financial advice reaches a higher
standard than their author’s knowledge of Adam Smith.
Incidentally, neither Adam Smith, nor any
individual, ever “invented modern free markets”. No society is “invented” by an individual or by designers (attempts to do always disappoint the designers or those affected by the design). Societies and changes within them
emerge by evolution as nameless individuals discover that what they try seems
to work in an existing social context in which they live with others. Free-markets emerged “spontaneously” and
evolved over many centuries prior to 1776, and, of course, unsurprisingly, have continued
to evolve in unpredictable ways since 1776.
Adam Smith observed that evolutionary process
and in doing so he noticed several important features of commercial society
that help us understand something of its dynamics. He made modest pragmatic proposals that were practicable that could
improve how commercial society mightd work better but he never made predictions about
whether his suggestions would be adopted.
2 Comments:
Gavin, You are right to point out that "The Wealth of Nations" had a preamble prior to its publication. Nevertheless, one can't dispute the fact that it came out for sale in 1776, which makes Scott Smith's statement almost correct.
Similarly, the "Declaration of Independence didn't just happen in 1776. It also had a preamble, just ike every other event.
airth
I was not remarking about any "preamble" to WN but to the fact that Smith completed his long manuscript in 1773 and he went to his London publisher to supervise its type setting, proof reading, and printing. It was essentially finished in 1773 and his intention was to publish it c.1774 a few months after he arrived in London. Much of WN for books 1 and 2 was written in as early as 1762-3 and can be seen in notes of his Glasgow lectures, almost verbatim.
Publication was delayed by events in London about the events in the British colonies in North America. For reasons mentioned above it was set, proofed and printed by December 1775- January 1776, and published in March 1776. These events were not deliberate, and the relative coincidence with events in June, 1776, is entirely "fortuitous" for subsequent history.
Given the actual delays in sending a few copies to the colonies, it is most unlikely that WN had any effect on the subsequent outcome in 1783. It was many years later that as US edition was published.
Gavin
Post a Comment
<< Home