Adam Smith Was Innocent ....
Benjamin
Mitra-Kahn writes 24 June HERE
"Division of labour was common knowledge by the 1770s"
“I always think of Adam Smith when I hear the
term 'division of labour' - but I'm being cured of this by reading a bit more
about Britains late 18th century in Jenny Uglow's The Lunar
Men. A very good read on industrialists and doctors, it remarks on Matthew Boulton's (think
steam engine / manufacturing) explanation to Lord Warwick (in 1773) that it is
ithe seperation of processes which allow British manufacturers to compete with
continental Europe. So Adam Smith's comments were not so much brilliant
discovery, but rather explanation of well established fact.”
Comment
Adam Smith never claimed nor implied that he discovered the division of labour. In his chapter on the division of labour in Wealth of Nations he states of pin manufacturing:
Adam Smith never claimed nor implied that he discovered the division of labour. In his chapter on the division of labour in Wealth of Nations he states of pin manufacturing:
“a
very trifling manufacture; but one in which the division of labour has been
very often taken notice of”. He also draws attention to the fact that the idea of
the division of labour was of long vintage before Wealth Of Nations, and before
he lectured on it to his Lectures on Jurisprudence classes from 1751-63. As were its consequences where he notes early
hunter-gatherers exchanging arrows for a share of the kill.
In
fact, Diderot’s French Encyclopedie (1755) contains the exact same arithmetical
demonstration of a pin factory as Smith detailed in WN. Also, the English "Cyclopedia" from Chambers in 1741 had a similar entry under pin-making with details of the division of Labour was widely available In short: The "Division of labour was common knowledge by the 1740s", as Smith noted. Adam Smith is innocent of this imputation.
The popular modern notion that Smith “discovered”
the division of labour was initiated by later authors, and spread by their
readers, and not by him.
4 Comments:
"Smith's" pin factory example can actually be traced back to Al-Ghazali (1058-1111) where he used an example of a needle factory. It was probably well known by Smith's time and your right about Smith's discovery being an invention of modern economists.
SM
Interesting reference.
TDL was boosted by hand tools and hand-driven machines. Power-driven machinery also boosted it as well as multiple manufacturing processes.
The sheer number of implements available to farming, households, transport, including shipping (rigging, ropes, navigation, small and large boats - all within sight of young Smith in Kirkcaldy's port and his uncles' farms) suggest general awareness of TDL.
The claims are ridiculous. As are tales that 'Smith' invented 'capitalism' and so on.
Gavin
I completely agree with your assessment about the "general awareness of TDL."
I find it interesting that these misconceptions spread among modern "scholars" when the primary texts are so widely available.
SM
The overwhelming majority of economists from graduation through to senior professorships do not read anything about the history of economic thought.
Hence, they imbibe whatever their half forgotten lecturers may have mentioned as 'throw away' smart lines at tutorials.
Gavin
Post a Comment
<< Home