Children of Controversy
I am working on a paper that suddenly came into focus over the weekend. There is a debate underway on the invisible-hand metaphor with a distinguished colleague who follows the modern economists’ perception of the significance of the metaphor. I am invited to respond to his paper for a refereed journal and I have been doing just that since Sunday.
Unfortunately, my computer crashed last night wiping out what I had written since Sunday – about 2,500 words – and I have spent most of today rewriting the text and recasting the bibliography. It’s a pain, made worse by the deadline (7 October).
The paper I am commenting upon is well written and strongly grounded. I feel like Lord Nelson felt at the Battle of Copenhagen, 1801. He wrote: ‘The Danish defences look formidable to children of war. I think I can better them.’ And he did.
In debate – a most useful exercise in friendly persuasion – the situation is often similar, to children of controversy. If you want hostile debate, take up politics.
Hence, my attention to Lost Legacy may have suffered since Sunday, though I hope not over the next few days.
Unfortunately, my computer crashed last night wiping out what I had written since Sunday – about 2,500 words – and I have spent most of today rewriting the text and recasting the bibliography. It’s a pain, made worse by the deadline (7 October).
The paper I am commenting upon is well written and strongly grounded. I feel like Lord Nelson felt at the Battle of Copenhagen, 1801. He wrote: ‘The Danish defences look formidable to children of war. I think I can better them.’ And he did.
In debate – a most useful exercise in friendly persuasion – the situation is often similar, to children of controversy. If you want hostile debate, take up politics.
Hence, my attention to Lost Legacy may have suffered since Sunday, though I hope not over the next few days.
Labels: Invisible Hand
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home