Jean Louis Peaucelle's Paper on Pin-Making and Wealth Of Nations
ADAM SMITH’S LOST LEGACY HAS BEEN MOVED BY “BLOGGER”, THE HOST SITE, TO A NEW ADDRESS:
TO FOLLOW ALL 2083 POSTS (AND COUNTNG) FROM HERE TO 2012 AND BEYOND, PLEASE USE THE NEW ADDRESS.
I received a PDF file from Jean Louis Peaucelle [firstname.lastname@example.org] discussing the famous pin-making example from Wealth Of Nations and I have posted it for wider circulation:
Find attached in PDF format a manuscript about capture of economic data beginnings in the context of pin-making during the eighteenth century in France. In particular, it contains a report of labour rhythms measured for some pin-making operations in 1700.
Besides, I rediscovered the documents that Adam Smith read about pin-making (the sources about which spoke Adam Ferguson). These documents are published in France, see:
Peaucelle, 2006, “Adam Smith’s use of multiple references for his pin-making example”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 13:4, 489-512.
Altogether, I revisited how Adam Smith built his theory about division of labour. I examined three topics:
- The documents about pin-making published in the eighteenth century, and all these documents were published in France;
- The real process of the pin-making, in craft shops in Paris or London, and the more industrialized process in Holland, Normandy and in Gloucester (UK);
- The economic reasoning about this pin-making industry, including the Adam Smith theory and the Charles Babbage theory.
The question that arises is the following: Is the theory about division of labour true in the case of pin-making?
This work was published in French.
Jean Louis Peaucelle